10/10/10

this game

so ive heard this game is alot like cod. It looks really fu nand I've been dying to see how it stands up to MW2.


SO which is better? This or MW2

23 comments:

  1. Hard to tell without really playing it tho

    ReplyDelete
  2. It really depends.

    I find MW2 great for fast-paced, instant action; short matches, but really, great fun.

    While BC2 is more team-based and rather slow/massive including vehicular warfare (16vs16 is just drooool), games usually take some time. Buildings are also destructible, so goodbye campers.

    Both games are great, so you can't go wrong with either haha ^^

    ReplyDelete
  3. Call of Duty is far more popular, but I've never played the second Bad Company game. Check out the older Battlefield games for PC

    ReplyDelete
  4. Personally I can't pick either because I haven't played any. But BFC2 looks like you have more things to do and i heard you can have a lot of people on one game.

    ReplyDelete
  5. anxious to play battlefied bad company 2

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've heard the same, will still go with MW2 though

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mmmm. Bad Co 2. I'll put in my vote for the Battlefield franchise.

    ReplyDelete
  8. both are fantastic games. it depends on whether you like epic huge battles or small but intense fights

    ReplyDelete
  9. Awesome graphics on that game, miles better than the ever so ancient quake. Although this reminds me of battle in Iraq or some shyte. Nightmarish!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I heard that it's like COD except dustier. =T

    ReplyDelete
  11. loving the blog layout dude!

    come check out my blog when u have a chance :)
    www.modernefusion.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  12. I like MW2. But nothing will ever beat CS for me :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. BC2 personally, especially if we're talking PC - no dedicated servers makes MW2 a big nono for me.

    ReplyDelete